METAKOGNISI SEBAGAI FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS DALAM PEMBELAJARAN KEPERAWATAN GAWAT DARURAT
Abstract
Background: Critical thinking for students will provide awareness to overcome every lecture problem by reviewing all related aspects and striving for individuals to always think out of the box that can support each lecture, especially in emergency nursing. Somehow, lot of students ignoring their task and not focus by the material that has been given by the lecturer. Students who are able to apply learning methods that are metacognitive will greatly help them to become self-regulated learners. Objective: The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between metacognition abilities and critical thinking skills in the learning process of emergency care. Methods: This study uses Cross Sectional Design with total sampling data collection techniques. All questionnaire has been tested using Rasch Model for seeing reliability and validity and result of logits were 0,81. Result: The results of this study show that the majority of respondents were female (84%). Based on logit score of metacognitions only two respondents achieve the highest score. Based on spearman rank analysis, there was no significant correlation between metacognition and critical thinking ability with p value 0.867 higher than 0.05. Conclusion: metacognition has been believed to improve quality of critical thinking skills of student for complex task and lecture, but this research shows different result
References
2. Filsaime, D. K (2008) Menguak Rahasia Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif. Jakarta :Prestasi Pustaka
3. Hunt, R R,.& Ellis, C.H. (2003). Fundamentals of Cognitive Psychology. NewYork : Mc Graw Hill
4. Ormrod, Jeane Ellis. (2009). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta :Erlangga
5. Maulana. (2008). Pendekatan Metakognitif Sebagai Alternatif Pembelajaran Matematika Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa PGSD. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar. Vol 1. No 10.
6. Khairani,M. (2016). Pendekatan Metakognitif Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Kelas X Sman 3 Payakumbuh. Jurnal Ipteks Terapan, Research of Applied Science and Education V9.i4 (253-260). http://dx.doi.org/10.22216/jit.2015.v9i4.391
7. Sardiman. (2011). Interaksi & Motivasi belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
8. De Laune, S.C. & Ladner, P.K. (2011). Fundamentals of Nursing: Standard & Practice, 4th ed. New York: Delmar Cengage Learning.
9. Topan, M., Abdurrahman, & Viyanti (2013). Pengaruh Metakognisi Terhadap Motivasi dan Penguasaan Konsep Melalui Model PBL. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika. Vol 1. No.7
10. Vrugt, A. & Oort, F.J., (2008). Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: pathways to achievement. Metacognition Learning Vol. 3, Issue 2, 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9022-4.
11. Guay, F., Chanal, J., Ratelle, C. F., Marsh, H. W., Larose, S., & Boivin, M. (2010). Intrinsic, identified, and controlled types of motivation for school subjects in young elementary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 711–735. doi: 10.1348/000709910X499084.
12. Jamaris, Martini. (2013). Orientasi Baru dalam Psikologi Pendidikan.Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia
13. Wood, G.L. & Haber, J. (2014). Nursing research; methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice, 8th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby
14. Dahlan, S. (2014). Langkah-langkah membuat proposal penelitian di bidang kedokteran dan kesehatan (edisi 2). Jakarta: CV Sagung Seto
15. Alias, M., &Sulaiman, N. L. (2017). Development of metacognition in higher education: Concepts and strategies. Metacognition and Successful Learning Strategies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2218- 8.ch002
16. Aizikovitsh-udi, E., & Cheng, D. (2015). Developing Critical Thinking Skills from Dispositions to Abilities: Mathematics Education from Early Childhood to High. Creative Education. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.64045
17. Alves, P. F. (2014). Vygotsky and Piaget: Scientific concepts. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2014.0303
18. Anderson, J. R., & Fincham, J. M. (2014). Extending problem-solving procedures through reflection. Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.06.002
19. Beaumont, J. (2010). A Sequence of Critical Thinking Tasks. TESOL Journal, 1(4), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.5054/tj.2010.234763
20. Brick, N. E., MacIntyre, T. E., & Campbell, M. J. (2016). Thinking and action: A cognitive perspective on self-regulation during endurance performance. Frontiers in Physiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00159
21. Zhao, N., Wardeska, J. G., McGuire, S. Y., & Cook, E. (2014). Metacognition: An Effective Tool to Promote Success in College Science Learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(4), 48–54. Retrieved from http://login.ezproxy.library.ualberta.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/lo gin.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=94637291&site=ehost-live&scope=site
